They Stole It

Someday, maybe 30 or 40 years from now, we'll find out how the Democrats stole the 2012 presidential election. How else to explain such an evilly-destructive president being re-elected, especially with such a high unemployment rate? It doesn't match any reasonable understanding of how elections generally turn out in the United States of America.

They must have stolen it.

Surely having the major media "in the bag" for your candidate, foregoing real journalism to serve as the propaganda arm for your party, is an enormous advantage. Originally hailed as the Second Coming, he wasn't vetted properly as a candidate. The second go-round all his foibles in office were glossed over.

Has this media-serving-as-political-propaganda verged on the criminal? If collusion has occurred between the Federal government and media designed to re-elect him, yes.

We've known about this "media bias" all along. We're newly aware of other reasons he won re-election:

1. The Big Lie on healthcare, e.g., "If you like your doctor, you will keep your doctor", "It will lower your healthcare costs", etc.
2. The cover-up on the Benghazi attacks in Libya.
3. The use of the Internal Revenue Service to handicap opposition political groups.

Now violations of the Hatch Act are being investigated by the Congress in both the White House political office and the Federal Election Commission. Perhaps specifics on government-media political collusion will come to light in the course of these investigations.

We have enough already to say why a man who openly wants to "fundamentally transform" America — in other words completely destroy it — was re-elected by the American people.

They stole it.